Midnight's Children.

This blog, assigned by Dr. Dilip Sir Barad, is about Midnight's Children by Salman Rushdie. In it, I discuss the narrative techniques used in the novel and provide a deconstructive reading of its characters. For further information Click here.

Video - 2

Narrative Technique in Midnight’s Children: Blending Western and Eastern Storytelling Traditions :-

      Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children is not only a landmark in postcolonial literature but also a fascinating experiment in narrative technique. Before we watch the cinematic adaptation of the novel, it is important to understand that the film’s storytelling style is quite different from how the novel itself is written. The narrative pattern of the book is deeply tied to its themes, especially its postcolonial context.

        One of the most remarkable aspects of Midnight’s Children is its hybridization a merging of Western literary devices with Eastern, especially Indian, oral storytelling traditions. The novel adopts the Western genre of the novel and modernist/postmodernist devices, but enriches them with Indian “masala” the layered, vivid, and often nonlinear methods of storytelling from the subcontinent.

The Bollywood “Lost and Found” Formula:-

          If we think about the storyline, many readers recall the swapping of children at birth a plot device that feels very “Bollywood.” The “lost and found” formula has been a tried and tested success in Indian cinema, often involving lost siblings or switched identities, eventually leading to dramatic revelations. While Western narratives, following Aristotle’s Poetics, often rely on realism, cause and effect, and probability, Eastern traditions are more comfortable with coincidence, fate, and fantastical twists.

Western Framing Techniques: Russian Dolls and Chinese Boxes:-

          In Western literature, layered storytelling is often described through metaphors like Russian dolls (a doll within a doll within a doll) or Chinese boxes (stories within stories). This frame narrative structure allows for multiple perspectives and complex layering of plot. Examples include:

Plato’s Dialogues

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

          In such works, each narrative is contained within another, offering depth and variety.

Eastern Oral Narrative Traditions :-

        Indian storytelling traditions, however, developed their own rich approaches to nested narratives.

Panchatantra

          At first glance, the Panchatantra seems to be simply a collection of animal fables. But these tales are framed within the story of King Amar Shakti (or King Sudarshana in other versions) and his three ignorant sons. The wise Brahmin Vishnu Sharma, unable to teach them through conventional means, uses interconnected stories to impart wisdom. The outer frame gives meaning to the inner stories.

Kathasaritsagara

           This 11th-century Sanskrit compilation by Somadeva contains countless layers of storytelling. It was written to entertain Queen Suryavati of Kashmir during a period of political and personal tragedy. Within its tales, there are stories within stories, each linked to the next like pearls on a string.

Vikram-Betal (Baital Pachisi)

        This famous set of 25 tales revolves around King Vikramaditya carrying the spirit Betal. Each time Vikram tries to take Betal away, the spirit tells a new story, ending with a riddle that forces Vikram to answer and return Betal to his tree. This recursive storytelling mirrors the layered nature of Midnight’s Children.

Thirty-Two Puppets of King Vikramaditya

            In another Indian tale cycle, each of the 32 statues in Vikramaditya’s throne narrates a story, creating multiple layers of narration within a larger frame.

Arabian Nights / Alif Laila

 

       Rushdie also draws on Middle Eastern storytelling traditions, particularly One Thousand and One Nights. The outer frame tells of Scheherazade, who spins endless stories to delay her execution. In Midnight’s Children, Saleem narrates to Padma much like Scheherazade narrates to the king keeping both the listener and the reader hooked.

Epic Frames: Ramayana and Mahabharata

         Even the great Indian epics are frame narratives.

Ramayana: Begins with Valmiki asking Narada if a perfect man exists. Narada tells him of Rama, and later Brahma instructs Valmiki to compose the epic. The tragic undertone is set early, foreshadowing the unhappy ending of Rama and Sita’s story.

Mahabharata: Told by Vyasa to Ganesha, but also narrated within the royal court, with multiple embedded tales.

Modern Indian Theatre Example: Girish Karnad’s Hayavadana

         Karnad’s play also uses “story within a story” structures. It combines performance, myth, and multiple narrators, showing that this technique is deeply ingrained in Indian creative traditions.

Rushdie’s Pickle Jar Structure :-

          In Midnight’s Children, Rushdie invents his own metaphor for layered storytelling—the pickle jars. Each of the 30 chapters is a jar containing memories and events, preserved and flavoured with the narrator’s own “spices.” The jars are:

Book One: from The Perforated Sheet to Tick Tock

Book Two: from The Fisherman’s Pointing Finger to The Buddha

Book Three: from A Wedding to Abracadabra

      At the end, one jar remains empty symbolizing the unfinished, open-ended nature of memory and history.

The Hybrid Narrative: Western and Eastern Elements

Rushdie fuses:

Western devices: unreliable narrator, social realism, historical detail, postmodernist historiographic metafiction

Eastern techniques: oral storytelling, magical realism, fantastical coincidence, multiple frames, mythic references

This results in:

1. Unreliable Narrator: Saleem admits his memory is imperfect.

2. Social Realism: Real historical events and figures (Indira Gandhi, Morarji Desai) are woven in.

3. Magical Realism: Saleem’s telepathic powers, the Midnight’s Children Conference.

4. Counter-History: Saleem’s version challenges the official “center” narrative.

5. Framed Narration: Saleem telling Padma his story, echoing Scheherazade.

Conclusion :-

         Midnight’s Children is a masterclass in hybrid narrative technique, blending the structural discipline of the Western novel with the imaginative abundance of Eastern oral traditions. Whether through Russian dolls or pickle jars, Panchatantra animals or Bollywood masala, Rushdie creates a layered, flavourful narrative that reflects both the complexity of India’s history and the richness of its storytelling heritage.

Video - 3

Decoding the "Undecidable": A Post-Structuralist Reading of Symbols in Midnight's Children

Introduction: 

         Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children is not merely a historical novel; it is a profound meditation on the nature of history, memory, and identity itself. While traditional literary analysis might seek to assign singular, fixed meanings to the novel's symbols, this approach risks oversimplifying the text's rich complexity. To truly grasp Rushdie's vision, we must employ a post-structuralist lens, a framework that sees language and meaning not as stable but as fluid, contradictory, and constantly in motion. This blog post will explore how Derridean philosophy particularly the concepts of pharmakon, archi-writing, and the free play of meaning provides an indispensable key to unlocking the layered symbolism of the perforated sheet, the silver spittoon, pickles, and the binary relationship between Saleem and Shiva.

1. The "Pharmakon" of History and the Dilemma of Memory

      The foundation of our deconstructive reading begins with a concept from Plato’s Phaedrus, which Derrida masterfully reinterprets: the word "pharmakon." This Greek term holds a dual meaning, signifying both remedy and poison. Plato’s Socrates uses it to argue that writing is a poison that weakens internal memory, yet he acknowledges it can also serve as a remedy for preserving knowledge. Derrida challenges this clear-cut binary, arguing that the word itself is "undecidable" it can be both at the same time.

          In Midnight's Children, history functions as this very "pharmakon." For the nation, history is a remedy, a source of collective identity and a record of the past. But it is also a poison, a suffocating burden of memory that can lead to a kind of national amnesia. Saleem’s own amnesia, triggered by the very object that carries his family’s history, becomes a powerful allegory for a nation overwhelmed by its own narrative, forgetting itself under the sheer weight of what it has to remember.

2. Archi-Writing and the Deconstruction of Narrative

      Plato, in his dialogues, privileged speech over writing, viewing the latter as an inferior, external form of communication. Derrida, however, introduces the concept of "archi-writing" to turn this hierarchy upside down. He argues that even before a word is spoken, it is "written" in the mind a conceptual mark or trace. Speech itself is thus a form of writing. This idea destabilizes the notion of a pure, original form of communication.

            This philosophical insight is central to understanding the narrative technique of Midnight's Children. Saleem's storytelling is not presented as a simple, spoken account of events. It is a layered, mediated form of communication, blending memory, thought, and language. The novel itself is an act of deconstructive writing, a technique that intentionally blurs the lines between oral tradition and written history. Rushdie highlights that identity and national history are not derived from a single, unadulterated source but are constructed through these complex layers of mediation, where memories are constantly being "written" and "rewritten."

 The Perforated Sheet: A Metaphor for Narrative and Perception

        The perforated sheet is one of the novel's most iconic and evocative symbols. At first glance, it is a physical barrier that both conceals and reveals. It is through this sheet that Saleem’s grandfather, Adam Aziz, is forced to examine his future wife, Nasim, in fragments. He sees only a knee, a nose, a hand never the whole person. This experience shapes his fragmented view of the world and, by extension, the fragmented identity of the nation.

          On a deeper, post-structuralist level, the perforated sheet serves as a metaphor for the novel's entire narrative structure and the nature of memory itself. Saleem's storytelling is like the sheet: it offers us glimpses and close-ups, but it never provides a complete, panoramic view. We are "condemned by a perforated sheet to a life of fragments," as Saleem says. This narrative technique challenges the idea of a single, coherent historical truth. Instead, it presents history as a series of fragmented moments, a perforated memory where some things are seen, and many more are hidden.

4. The Silver Spittoon: The Weapon of Forgetting

           The silver spittoon is a symbol rich with contradictory meanings. It is an heirloom, a tangible link to the family’s past and thus a symbol of memory. However, when it falls and strikes Saleem, it becomes the direct cause of his amnesia. The object meant to preserve the past is the very thing that erases it. This paradox highlights a central theme of the novel: the tools of preservation can also be the instruments of destruction.

           This symbolic duality extends to the nation itself. The historical records and symbols we use to remember our past can be so heavy and overwhelming that they lead to collective forgetfulness. The spittoon's impact on Saleem is a personal trauma that doubles as a national allegory, showing how a nation's inability to reconcile with its vast, complex history makes it vulnerable to political forces that seek to manipulate that amnesia for power.

5. Pickles: Preserving and Destroying the Past

      Saleem's pickle factory is a powerful extension of this dualistic symbolism. The act of pickling is, by definition, one of preservation—it keeps food from spoiling. Saleem uses this process as a metaphor for his storytelling, "pickling" his memories and the nation's history into jars for posterity. He hopes his son, Aadam, will one day "know me... and India... and the pickles."

      Yet, pickling also involves destruction. Ingredients are chopped, crushed, and transformed in a brine that breaks them down. This duality suggests that preserving history is not a pristine act of conservation; it is a messy, transformative process that alters the original substance. The pickles, constantly "eroding something or destroying something," mirror Saleem's own body, which is "constantly cracking." He is both a preserver of stories and a man being destroyed by their weight.

6. Saleem and Shiva: Complementary Opposites

       The relationship between Saleem and his "shadow twin," Shiva, transcends a simple good-versus-evil binary. They are complementary opposites, akin to the yin-yang philosophy. Saleem is the thinker, the passive chronicler of events; Shiva is the man of action, the destroyer. This dynamic challenges the Western tradition of strict binary oppositions.

           Their relationship allegorizes the complex, often contradictory forces at play within India itself. Saleem represents the intellectual, historical consciousness of the nation, while Shiva embodies its raw, aggressive, and potentially destructive power. The novel suggests that one cannot exist without the other; they are interwoven forces that shape the nation's evolving story. Shiva’s forgetfulness makes him a perfect pawn for political power, contrasting with Saleem’s amnesia, which stems from the unbearable burden of his memory.

Conclusion: 

          Through this post-structuralist reading, Midnight's Children emerges as a novel that rejects definitive, fixed meanings. The symbols, characters, and narrative are not endpoints but starting points for a "free play of meaning." By embracing the dualities within each symbol remedy/poison, conceal/reveal, preserve/destroy—we understand that Rushdie's intent was to portray history and national identity not as static truths, but as fluid, contested terrains. The novel itself, through its use of deconstructive writing, is a testament to the power of storytelling to endlessly reinterpret and rewrite the past, emphasizing that our understanding of who we are is always in flux, constructed through layers of memory, language, and imagination.

Article:-

Erasure and Oppression: The Bulldozer in Midnight's Children

           In Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children, the bulldozer is a strong symbol of government oppression and misuse of power, especially during Indira Gandhi's Emergency period. It shows how the state used force to destroy homes, erase people’s identities, and push political plans while pretending it was for “beautification.” The word “bulldozer” in the novel also reflects its real meaning in real life – not just a machine, but a symbol of violent control by the authorities.

           Rushdie uses the bulldozer to show how unchecked political power can crush and dehumanize powerless people. This appears in several important moments in the novel:

Dehumanization: When the bulldozer works, it creates a dust storm that makes people look like “ghosts of ourselves” or “old, neglected furniture.” It takes away their human dignity and turns them into objects. The rich escape from its path, showing the gap between the powerful and the poor.

Suppression of Dissent: The narrator wonders if warnings against “treason” also included bulldozers, connecting rebellion with the government’s readiness to crush any resistance both physically and mentally.

Urban “Beautification”: The bulldozer plays a key role in Sanjay Gandhi’s city “beautification” projects. It is a cold, mechanical tool of the government that destroys poor neighborhoods under the excuse of improving the city. The machine’s loud noise even drowns out the narrator’s scream, showing how the poor have no voice.

Erasure of History and Identity: The bulldozer’s most personal attack is when it takes away Saleem’s silver spittoon – a treasured family item linking him to his past. Losing this “real, physical” object cuts his connection to his family and history, showing how authoritarian powers erase not just buildings but also the cultural and emotional things that connect people to their roots.

Emotional and Psychological Devastation: The narrator’s “nostalgia for my bulldozed silver spittoon” shows the deep emotional pain caused by the government’s actions. The bulldozer is not only a sign of physical destruction but also of the lasting sadness and sense of loss that survivors feel.

Conclusion:

       The bulldozer is a powerful metaphor in Midnight’s Children for the harsh control of the government. Rushdie criticizes the authoritarian tactics of the Emergency by showing the human suffering caused by such rule. Sadly, this symbol is still relevant today, as even now governments sometimes use their power to target the poor and erase their histories.

Thank you for reading...

Reference:-

• DoE-MKBU. “Deconstructive Reading of Symbols | Midnight’s Children | Sem 3 Online Classes | 2021 07 13.” YouTube, 13 July 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgJMf9BiI14.Accessed 13 August 2025.

• DoE-MKBU. “Narrative Technique | Midnight’s Children | Sem 3 Online Classes | 2021 07 12.” YouTube, 12 July 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=opu-zd4JNbo.Accessed 13 August 2025.

• Barad, Dilip. "Erasure and Oppression: The Bulldozer as a Tool of Authoritarianism in Midnight's Children." ResearchGate, August 2024, Https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383410297_Erasure_and_Oppression_The_Bulldozer_as_a_Toolof_Authoritarianism_in_Midnight's_Children. Accessed 13 August 2025.

• Barad, Dilip. Midnight’s Children – Salman Rushdie. Dilip Barad's Blog, 5 Aug. 2021, blog.dilipbarad.com/2021/08/midnights-children.html. Accessed 14 Aug. 2025.

Worksheet: Film Screening—Deepa Mehta's Midnight's Children

This blog was assigned by Dr. Dilip Barad. It is about the film Midnight’s Children directed by Deepa Mehta, based on the novel by Salman Rushdie.For further information Click here.

Salman Rushdie :-

Salman Rushdie is a British Indian novelist and essayist, known for his works that often blend historical fiction and magical realism, exploring themes of migration, cultural identity, and the complex relationship between East and West. He was born in Bombay, India, in 1947, and his writing career took off with the publication of Midnight's Children in 1981, which won the Booker Prize. A major controversy erupted with his fourth novel, The Satanic Verses (1988), leading to death threats and a fatwa issued by the Iranian government. 

Basic information about the Novel:-

          Midnight's Children" is a 1981 novel by Salman Rushdie, known for its blend of magical realism, historical fiction, and postcolonial themes. The story centers on Saleem Sinai, born at the exact stroke of midnight on August 15, 1947, the moment of India's independence. He and other children born during that hour, the "midnight's children," possess special abilities and are intricately linked to the nation's history. 

About the Movie – Midnight’s Children :

      Midnight’s Children is a 2012 movie directed by Deepa Mehta, based on the famous novel by Salman Rushdie. Rushdie also wrote the movie’s script and narrates the story himself. The film mixes real history with magical elements to tell the story of India from the time it became independent in 1947 to the political Emergency in the 1970s.

       The main character, Saleem Sinai, is born at the exact moment when India becomes free — midnight on 15 August 1947. At the same time, another boy named Shiva is born in the same hospital. A nurse secretly switches the two babies, so they grow up in each other’s families. This one act changes their whole lives and becomes a symbol of how India’s identity is also a mix of different cultures, classes, and histories.

      As Saleem grows up, he discovers he has a magical power — he can talk in his mind to all the other “Midnight’s Children”, who were also born in that first hour of independence. Each of these children has a special ability. Through Saleem’s life, we see India’s joys, struggles, wars, family drama, and political changes.

    The film also deals with postcolonial themes like hybrid identity, the influence of language, the clash between tradition and modernity, and the idea that history is shaped by those who tell it.

Pre - viewing  Task :-

1. Who narrates history — the victors or the marginalized? How does this relate to personal identity?

        Most of the time, history is told by the victors  those who win wars, hold political power, or control education. They decide what gets remembered and what is left out. This often means the experiences of the poor, minorities, or defeated groups are missing from official records.

     

         This links to personal identity because the way history is told shapes how we see ourselves. If only the winners’ voices are heard, many identities are erased. Saleem’s life being switched at birth between rich and poor families shows how postcolonial identity in India is complex, layered, and made up of many influences, not a single, pure origin.

2. What makes a nation — geography, governance, culture, or memory?

          A nation is more than just its physical land or its government. Geography defines boundaries, and governance runs the state, but a nation’s true heart lies in shared culture, traditions, and collective memories.

     

         This shows that a nation is not only about political systems or maps. It is built from the emotional and cultural ties that connect people, even across new borders. Memory plays a big role  shared experiences of joy, suffering, and history keep the feeling of the nation alive.

3. Can language be colonized or decolonized? (English in India)

        Language can be colonized  during British rule, English was used as a tool of power. Those who spoke English fluently had access to better jobs, education, and social status, while others were excluded. This made English a symbol of authority and control.

        However, language can also be decolonized. After independence, Indians began using English in their own way, mixing it with local words, cultural references, and storytelling styles. Salman Rushdie calls this “chutnification of English” like making chutney, where many different flavours combine to make something new.

       In the film, although the narration is in English, it is full of Indian imagery, rhythms, and cultural style. This shows that English has been transformed from a colonial tool into a language that expresses Indian identity and experience.

Connections to the Reading List Concepts

Hybridity (Homi K. Bhabha): Saleem and Shiva’s swapped identities represent the mixing of religion, class, and culture — a symbol of India’s hybrid postcolonial identity.

Nation as a Eurocentric Idea (Partha Chatterjee): Instead of one official national story, the film shows that a nation is made up of many personal, diverse stories.

Chutnification of English (Salman Rushdie): English is reshaped by Indian culture, making it a tool for self-expression rather than colonial control.

2. While-Watching Activities

Opening Scene — Nation and Identity Together

         The film opens with Saleem Sinai’s voice telling us he was born at exactly midnight on 15 August 1947 the moment India became free from British rule. This is not just an interesting coincidence; it’s a deliberate symbolic choice. His birth represents the birth of a new nation. As we watch the film, we see that Saleem’s personal journey mirrors India’s national journey. When the country faces moments of unity, division, or transformation, Saleem’s own life reflects those changes. His relationships, struggles, and even his sense of self are deeply connected to what is happening in India. This beginning sets the tone for the whole film, showing that an individual’s identity can be shaped by the history and politics of the place they live in.

Birth Switch of Saleem and Shiva — Mixed Identities

      One of the most important events in the story is the switching of two newborn babies in the hospital. A nurse named Mary, influenced by political and personal ideas, decides to swap them. Saleem, the biological son of a poor Hindu woman, is given to a rich Muslim family. Shiva, the biological son of that rich family, is handed to the poor mother. This single act completely changes both children’s lives. Saleem grows up in a wealthy household, receiving education and comfort, while Shiva is raised in poverty, dealing with daily struggles and hardships.

     This switch creates hybrid identities for both boys  biologically they belong to one background, but socially and politically they are shaped by a completely different one. In a larger sense, this mirrors India’s own hybrid nature: a land where many religions, languages, and social classes coexist, sometimes in harmony and sometimes in conflict. It shows how identity is not fixed but shaped by circumstances.

Saleem’s Narration — Trust and Metafiction

      The whole story is told by Saleem himself, which means we see events from his point of view. But Saleem is not a perfectly reliable narrator. He openly admits that his memory is faulty  sometimes he mixes up dates, changes the order of events, or adds magical elements to what happened. This style is called metafiction, because the story makes us aware that it is a story, shaped by the person telling it.

         This is important because it reminds us that history is not always an exact record of facts. It is often a mixture of reality, memory, and imagination. By blending political history with his personal life and magical realism, Saleem creates a version of the past that is emotional and symbolic rather than purely factual. This makes us question not just Saleem’s truth, but also the nature of storytelling and history itself.

The Emergency Period — Freedom Under Threat

       The Emergency of 1975–77 is shown in the film as a dark time for India. The government, led by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, takes extreme measures:

People are arrested without fair trials.

Newspapers and media are censored, meaning they cannot speak freely.

Slum areas are destroyed in the name of “progress.”

Poor men are forced into sterilization programs to control the population.

            For Saleem, the Emergency is personally devastating. His special group of magical “Midnight’s Children” children born at the same moment as him, each with unique powers is broken apart. The sense of hope and unity they represented is crushed by political control. This period in the film warns us that even in a free country, democracy can be taken away when leaders misuse their power.

Use of English, Hindi, and Urdu — Language as Identity

      Language is an important symbol in the film. The narration, spoken by Salman Rushdie himself, is in English, but the characters often speak a mix of English, Hindi, and Urdu. This switching between languages feels authentic to India, where people often blend tongues in everyday conversations.

      Rushdie calls this “chutnification of English”  a playful term for taking English (the language of the former colonizers) and mixing it with local words, expressions, and rhythms until it becomes something uniquely Indian. In the film, this blending of languages reflects India’s complex identity: part colonial history, part indigenous culture, and fully its own. Just as the language is a mix, so is the nation’s identity  and so is Saleem’s own story.

Post-Watching Activities :-

Group discussion:-

Hybridity and Identity :-

    In Midnight’s Children, Saleem and Shiva’s lives are deeply shaped by hybrid identities. They are both born at the stroke of midnight on August 15, 1947  the moment of India’s independence but their identities are switched at birth.

           Saleem, biologically the child of a poor street performer, grows up in a wealthy Muslim family.

      Shiva, biologically from the rich family, grows up in poverty.

This swap makes them hybrids in multiple ways:

Culturally — They live in environments different from their birth heritage.

Religiously — Saleem’s upbringing places him in a Muslim household though he has Hindu parentage; Shiva grows up Hindu but with Muslim biological roots.

Politically — Both are tied to the fate of post-independence India but represent different class and ideological positions.

        According to Homi K. Bhabha’s “Third Space” theory, hybrid identity is not just confusion it’s a space where new cultural meanings are created. The film shows this through Saleem’s journey: he does not belong fully to any single group, but his in-betweenness allows him to see India’s diversity and contradictions. This suggests hybridity can be a possibility for understanding and connection, not just a source of conflict.

Narrating the Nation :-

         The story rewrites the history of India through Saleem’s personal memories. Instead of a purely political timeline, the film blends national events (Partition, wars, Emergency) with intimate family stories.

      This challenges the Eurocentric model of nationhood  which sees the nation as a fixed territory, a unified culture, and a linear story of progress. In Midnight’s Children, history is shown as fragmented, emotional, and subjective.

        Partha Chatterjee argues that Indian nationalism developed differently from Western models: it combined modern political structures with deep cultural and religious traditions. In the film, this is visible in how the idea of “India” is both a political dream (freedom from colonial rule) and a cultural puzzle (multiple religions, languages, and memories competing).

Timeline: History & Saleem’s Life

1. British Colonial Rule (Before 1947)

History: India under British control; European ideas of nationhood dominate.

Saleem’s Connection: Born at the stroke of midnight on 15 August 1947, but his life is tied to colonial legacies — his parents live in a society shaped by British class divisions, education, and politics.

2. Independence & Partition (1947)

History: India becomes free; Partition divides India and Pakistan; mass migration and violence occur.

Saleem’s Connection: Switched at birth with Shiva — a symbol of how identities in the new nations are unstable and accidental. His family’s move mirrors the dislocation millions faced.

3. Wars between India and Pakistan (1965 & 1971)

History: India and Pakistan fight wars; Bangladesh is created in 1971.

Saleem’s Connection: He loses memory in war, becomes part of the army, and experiences the destruction that political decisions bring to ordinary lives.

4. The Emergency (1975–1977)

History: Prime Minister Indira Gandhi suspends democracy, arrests opponents, and enforces strict control.

Saleem’s Connection: Midnight’s Children are hunted down and sterilized — representing how political power suppresses diversity and freedom.

 Chutnification of English :-

        Salman Rushdie is famous for “chutnifying” English  mixing it with Indian words, idioms, and rhythms to make it reflect Indian life. In the film, this appears both in narration and in dialogue where Hindi/Urdu words are blended with English.

      Chutnification is not just adding spice  it’s a political act. It challenges the idea that English must remain “pure” and shows how it can become an Indian language. Rushdie uses words like “pickling” as a metaphor: just as chutney mixes and preserves many flavours, his English preserves the mix of colonial and local cultures.

      Chutnified English can carry emotional and cultural meanings that “standard” English cannot fully express.

Conclusion:-

In Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children and Deepa Mehta’s film adaptation, Parvati-the-witch represents magical realism and connects to themes of love, politics, and destiny, though the film condenses or alters events for cinematic flow. In the novel, Parvati falls in love with Saleem, marries Picture Singh, and later dies in the Emergency; the movie keeps her magical powers and her key role in Saleem’s life but simplifies her political involvement and the depth of her inner struggles. Her significance lies in how she symbolizes ordinary people’s vulnerability in turbulent times, the blending of personal and national histories, and the endurance of magic and belief amidst political repression. Both versions show her as a bridge between the mystical and the real, though the novel offers richer detail, while the film focuses on visual storytelling and emotional impact.

Reference :-

• Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. Routledge, 1994.
• Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton University Press, 1993.
• Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. Routledge, 2006.
• Mehta, Deepa, director. Midnight’s Children. David Hamilton Productions, 2012.
• Rushdie, Salman. Midnight’s Children. Jonathan Cape, 1981.